Anycast ingress
Advertise service entry points so users reach an appropriate edge while preserving the ability to steer around route or capacity events.
ROUTING & INTERCONNECT
Fewer unnecessary hand-offs. More control over how traffic enters the platform.
Peering and private interconnect strategy is used to reduce avoidable transit, stabilize route selection and keep high-volume traffic close to the network edge.
TWELVE YEARS OF INFRASTRUCTURE OPERATIONS · API-FIRST CONTROL · ENGINEERED FOR PRODUCTION
BITACTIVE / ROUTING & INTERCONNECTLIVE ARCHITECTURE VIEW
SOURCE → PEERING → BACKBONE → EDGEDELIVER
BGPpolicy control
IX / PNIinterconnect models
ECMPpath distribution
Dual stackIPv4 / IPv6
VISUAL / SERVICE MODEL
See the architecture before reading the detail.
This view summarizes the service boundary, decision points and operational signals for Routing & Interconnect.
System topologyLOGICAL VIEW / NOT TO SCALE
The diagram represents the logical request or control path. Exact placement, capacity and failure-domain selection are defined during architecture review.
Operational signalsCONTROL PLANE
SOURCE
ASN
82%PEERING
BGP
67%BACKBONE
PRIVATE
91%EDGE
DELIVER
74%Visual status indicators are conceptual UI examples and do not expose customer data.
01 / SOURCEASN
Traffic or control enters a defined service boundary.
02 / PEERINGBGP
Policy and placement are evaluated against current state.
03 / BACKBONEPRIVATE
The workload is processed by the appropriate infrastructure layer.
04 / EDGEDELIVER
Telemetry is preserved so the path can be explained operationally.
01 / NETWORK MODEL
The network is part of the service logic.
BitActive uses a layered network model: public Anycast ingress at the edge, controlled regional paths, private interconnects where they improve route quality, and explicit origin connectivity. The intent is to keep the path understandable enough that an operator can explain why traffic entered a location, where it was processed and which dependency added latency.
The 310+ edge-location footprint and 42 deployment regions shown across the BitActive platform describe the global delivery fabric. Capacity is engineered as an aggregate network, while individual services are placed only where their traffic profile and operational requirements justify presence. That distinction avoids treating every location as interchangeable.
02 / ROUTE PATH
From access network to origin region.
BITACTIVE / REQUEST PATHARCHITECTURE
Access networkSTAGE 01
Peer edgeSTAGE 02
Route policySTAGE 03
BackboneSTAGE 04
Service regionSTAGE 05
The diagram is a logical service path. Exact routing, placement and capacity are selected per workload and service profile.
03 / NETWORK ENGINEERING
Route quality, capacity and observability together.
Peering strategy
Use direct interconnects where traffic concentration and route quality justify them, reducing avoidable transit and hand-offs.
Backbone control
Keep regional traffic paths explicit so origin and cross-region traffic do not depend on accidental public-internet route selection.
Performance evidence
Track latency percentiles, route state, request timing and upstream health so network decisions can be tied to observed behaviour.
04 / OPERATIONS
Network changes carry operational context.
Routing changes are treated as production changes. Policy, maintenance and interconnect events are reviewed against expected traffic paths and service dependencies. Monitoring focuses on conditions that require action: route loss, sustained latency shifts, packet-loss patterns, capacity pressure and upstream health.
The result is a network that can support CDN, streaming, SaaS and enterprise workloads without pretending that every packet follows one perfect route. The platform is designed to make those route decisions visible and manageable when conditions change.
Discuss the architecture.
BitActive works with referred clients on premium infrastructure engagements. Start with the workload, traffic profile and operational requirements.